When I write “resisting the numbers game”, it’s not that I have resisted, but that I’m actively in the process of trying to resist. I straddle the two sides: part of me believes that connection matters more than cold figures, while another part says, “Darn! Can’t I just sell more of these things?” A part of me looks for integrity in a work of art; a part of me is impressed with plain old success.
So I’ve sold, I don’t know, a few hundred books. That’s pretty significant, and the thought of all those people investing their attention in my work should, more than anything else, humble me. True, when I know someone has bought my book my first thought is to hope it proves worthy of his/her attention. But as much as I fight it I was born into a world dominated by numbers, and so I look to the numbers to validate me.
When I feel myself sinking into the numbers trap, I often turn to the memory of a friend and writer who I admired hugely, Lynn Luria-Sukenick, who I got to know in California and died fifteen years ago now. Her work was never commercially successful—no big numbers there—but she had a unique sensibility and her writing stays with you, like a heartfelt song. In one prose poem she writes, “A deer leaps her slanted script over the field.” Touching a dolphin at Sea World is “like stroking a giant olive”. To me her writing is still alive, and a reminder that beauty and meaning can’t be measured.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e4e8/7e4e8bdfe4ef04ef5571cc1dfdc3d6f367624d03" alt=""
Thanks for your thoughts about the numbers game, Judith. It's too easy to judge success as a author solely by how many books are sold (or downloaded in this new era of eBooks).
ReplyDeleteI have to admit it is heartening if the sales/downloads graph sneaks upwards, but your thoughts remind me that I need to think beyond the numbers. The words in your post are a timely reminder and a help to remember why I write.
Many thanks,
Wil