I'm lucky in that I have a gregarious streak that does lend itself to marketing, at least for a while. But it's liberating to acknowledge that it can get tiresome. The Web has given authors many new vehicles for marketing their work; however it has also created a situation where you're potentially marketing all the time. You've always got to be ripe for that adrenalin surge; at any moment of the day, you can see how well you're doing -- or, more typically, not.
Since my small, personal artistic/publishing experiment does not lend itself to by-the-numbers success, I'm going to come up with my own metric -- one that allows me to succeed. And that would be...the "Raves to Readers Ratio". My book isn't out there in major commodity-level quantities, but I get a lot of phone calls and "wow" emails and even the occasional person stopping me on the street to say, "I have to tell you what your book meant to me..." This amounts to a high Raves to Readers Ratio. I can feel pretty good about that, right? And the world is so full of figures and statistics and ways to measure this or that, what's wrong with adding one more?
Here I am on top of a sand dune in Israel, about to dash down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b97/33b9782d0f2787d4de845096f918f5ed968110df" alt=""
I'm pretty happy with my numbers. I know I can always "do better" and obviously I want to. But I think for where I am so far I'm doing pretty good, better than I expected to be doing by this point. So I feel very fortunate!
ReplyDeleteGreat, Zoe! This is one case where I've very happy to be proven wrong!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, Judy. Success can be defined by metrics other than numbers. My book on women & self-sacrifice, "Slaying the Mermaid," disappointed the publisher, which hoped for a best-seller. But I got the same type of comments you describe--people telling me how important it was to them. One woman actually said my book changed her life. Isn't that success?
ReplyDelete